Question:
Game 2 of finals was fixed. nobody can deny that ?
anonymous
2010-06-06 23:19:20 UTC
with 1:59 left in the 4th. The ball was knocked out of bounds, the ball was CLEARLY CLEARLY off of Kevin Garnett. The refs went and *reviewed* it, and its still Celtic ball ? nothing anymore needs to be seen and said. The finals are fixed. Is there any other explanation ? 3 refs go and review the play, they see its clearly off KG and its still Celtics ball. David Stern doesn't want Kobe to get his 5th ring .
Eleven answers:
NITWIG
2010-06-06 23:25:09 UTC
This is getting ridiculous, I read question after question on yahoo a few hours ago from people insisting the game was fixed for the Lakers & then when the Lakers lose you have people saying the game was fixed for the Celtics. No matter who wins the series or how the fouls are called the fans on the losing team will say the refs were out to get their team. Can't anybody just enjoy the games anymore without some type of conspiracy?
Corey (Go Dubs!)
2010-06-07 06:23:34 UTC
They need 100% verification that they made the incorrect call to overturn it. Although it appeared they made the wrong call, there was enough doubt in the refs mind to let the call stand. Their fingers were too close together to make a definitive call. The Lakers went to the line 41 times to the 26 for the Celtics. How do you figure the game was fixed in favor of the Celtics? It was a bad call, but it isn't proof the game was fixed. The Celtics outplayed the Lakers tonight, plain and simple. Deal with it.
4-3.
2010-06-07 06:23:54 UTC
No actually there wasn't conclusive evidence that it was off of Garnetts hand because Gasol's fingers looked like they contributed to the ball being out of bounds, along with Garnetts hand. If they both threw it out of bounds, and the ref originally said Celtics ball than why would he overturn it? Trust me, I know the NBA has the worst officiating in all of sports, but you Lakers fans need to learn how to take a loss and move on.
KING (Doesn't stand 4 Lebron!)
2010-06-07 06:21:07 UTC
I don't think so because the Lakers CLEARLY had 41 free throws to the Celtics 26...and the Celtics would of had less if it weren't for the Lakers purposely fouling the Celtics at the end of the game to save time...
yoga_chica84
2010-06-07 14:43:20 UTC
NOPE... They got the call right. Hear me out:



The hand is part of the ball and the reason they called it that way is because it was Gasol's momentum and arm movement that caused it to go out of bounds. It's just common sense really. Another way to look at it: Gasol was the last player to touch it because KG's hand doesn't count as it was touching the ball at the time.



PROOF (read the part about Incidental Contact and you will see I am right) http://www.nba.com/features/misunderstoodrules_051128.html
?
2010-06-07 06:29:29 UTC
not fixed, just a poorly ref'ed game. the pierce block on artest was not a foul, it was clearly off garnett, and allen flopped on kobe's fifth, plus the number of foul shots favors the lakers if anybody.
U kNO
2010-06-07 06:24:16 UTC
yea somthing is fish lakers shooting 41 freethrow and the celtics only 16 with all the intentional fouling at the end or the block shot pierce put on artest
Eddie
2010-06-07 09:24:03 UTC
I guess Ray Allen hitting those 8 three points shot were fixed too.
dick_ache
2010-06-07 07:01:44 UTC
why do sore loser fans always have to cry fix
WALTER! (Bleeding Green)
2010-06-07 06:20:52 UTC
I wish your mom was fixed....then we wouldnt have to deal with this crap.



Too mean? probably but like I care lol
?
2010-06-07 06:58:07 UTC
nobody get .......


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...