Question:
What do you think about these TRADES?
OM
2008-07-19 11:47:02 UTC
Trade 1
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1977~2010~63~1724&teams=8~8~28~28&te=&cash=

Trade 2
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2775~2996~883~111~3005~387&teams=29~29~29~8~8~8&te=&cash=

Trade 3
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2006~25~849~3002~617&teams=13~6~13~23~23&te=&cash=

Trade 4
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1713~3208~366~2770~2747~1710~518~2178&teams=15~15~15~15~7~7~7~7&te=&cash=

Trade 5
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1711~1981~2456~3030~990~1017&teams=18~18~18~18~4~4&te=&cash=

Trade 6
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1006~308~378&teams=9~15~15&te=&cash=

Please give me your comments on all the trades!
Also which can most likely happen?
Which trade is the best trade?
Also which one is the worst trade?
Fourteen answers:
Go Lakers!!!
2008-07-19 12:31:04 UTC
Trade 1 is a great trade, and it is even on both sides. I also think that both teams would accept that trade. Good Job!



Trade 2 is also an awesome trade. You are like a trade master!



I'm sorry, but trade 3 is a horrible trade. Every team is getting ripped off. Good try though!



Trade 4 is also a bad trade for Denver. It is getting ripped off. They are giving up AI and some good players on their bench basically nothing. AI is worth a lot more than that.



Trade 5 is a great trade. Like trades 1 and 2, it is even on both sides, and it is likely to happen in real life.



Trade 6 is also a great trade. Good Job!!!



You are very good at trades. You just have to fix up trades 3 and 4.
mentone junglist
2008-07-19 13:26:19 UTC
1- not a "bad" trade per se, but why would the Pistons give up their team captain and a guy who can play 3 positions for a bench guy and a PF? I assume if this deal went down the Pistons would still have Sheed so what would be the point??



2-Really??? No comment....



3- This trade makes some sense, but not alot, the Lakers dont need Howard, They dont want Kenny Thomas, (or an Artest deal would already be done). The Lakers cant give up Farmar unless they pick up another point guard..... Leave the Lakers out of this deal completely and it is a great trade for the Kings/Mavs



4-HUH?



5- Why would the Bulls bring back Eddie Curry, they knew he was damaged goods when they shipped him to new york, and Randolph??? This just doesnt make sense???



6- This trade would be interesting except the Bucks just picked up Jefferson and things could actually be good there with him, Redd, and Bogut, they actually are laying the work for a decent team (well hell a horrible team can be the 8 seed in the east). The warriors are making attempt to re-build, They got some pieces, so they would probably be better off keeping Harrington and Jackson....



Best Trade is #3 if you left the Lakers out of it

Worst Trades are 2 and 4, they are just rediculous



None of them have much of any chance of happening
Michaelâ„¢
2008-07-19 12:09:23 UTC
Trade 1- I like it actually, as a Detroit fan this is one of the few trades that I agree with involving Tayshaun Prince. I don't think you can pry Bosh from the Raptors though.



Trade 2 - This would never happen, Maxiell and Samb are going to be key players for Detroit, Dumars will never trade them.



Trade 3 - It's ok, but L.A. won't trade Jordan Farmar, I think they him as an evetual replacement for Fisher full time.



Trade 4 - This is pretty good, the Nuggets desperately need a center so Bogut works out, and they need a point guard which they get with Williams. Mason would be an excellent sixth man. I could see the Nuggets trading Iverson actually.



Trade 5 - This is a good trade because the Knicks need a pointguard and the bulls need frontcourt help.



Trade 6 - The Warriors won't trade Stephen Jackson, he is their captain and now is vital to their success. Besides, Milwaukee just acquired Jefferson, they should at least give him a try first.



Best trade is 5



Most likely to happen is 5



The worst trade is 1 or 2 because they aren't likely to happen.
turbanator
2008-07-19 12:02:20 UTC
Trade 1:

No...the raptors wouldnt trade chris bosh for chauncey...chauncey is a pg and the raptors have a decent pg...



Trade 2:

No...emphis gets 3 expiring contracts and they trade the face of their franchise by trading away rudy gay. i dont think rasheed wallace can ever match rudy gays ability



Trade 3

No...Dallas wouldnt do that cuz they already nixed the josh howard artest deal...and the lakers wouldnt do that cuz they are trading away jordan farmar and lamar odom...jordan farmar is probly one of the best back up pgs in the league...and hes developing fast.



Trade 4

I dont think denver would trade allen iverson away...him and carmelo is a good 2-man team...but i think the bucks would want AI with that type of contract



Trade 5

This is a good trade because the bulld need to get rid of PGs and they do that in this trade. also the knicks NEED depth and a PG...stephon marbury is getting 20+ mil this year so they should also look to somehow move him...but this is a great trade



Trade 6

No...the only reason being the bucks just got richard jefferson...maybe down the road if RJ isnt preforming this might work



The best trade: Trade 5

The worst trade: Trade 4

Most likely to happen: Trade 5



Hope this helped!!
trevor w
2008-07-19 11:58:01 UTC
1. this doesnt benefit either team because the raptors have the great front court tandem of bosh and o'neal so they wont want to trade bosh

2. no because the grizzlies need gay and they dont need maxiel or wallace because they have gasol

3. no, the lakers would never do this, howard doesnt help them and thomas is a dead contract, the mavs have already said they dont want to trade howard for artest

4. no, i dont see the nuggets trading iverson while he averages 27 ppg, plus both teams give too many players

5. plausible, the bulls lose hinrick so they can work on rose and get two good big guys

6. the warriors dont need jefferson because they picked up meggette and i dont think they would give up two solid players for him anyway



the best trade is 5

the worst trade is 3/4
iB@0
2008-07-19 11:54:45 UTC
The 3rd and 5th trade have the best chance of happening



But number 3 has the better chance over trade 5
Student Athlete
2008-07-19 12:31:09 UTC
they all suck, especialy trade 2.wtf. marko jaric is a overpaid scrub along with those other players for sheed and explosive maxiell. yea right. trade 1 is maybe close caz they get bosh but kapano suck. he can only shoot threes at the allstar. but in the game, he cant. and they cant play defense.
haluska
2016-10-05 12:30:31 UTC
BADDD Durant>>>>>Howard Westbrook
Scottie yo
2008-07-20 08:18:38 UTC
trade1= good

trade2=not as good

trade3=alright

trade4=bucks win trade with iverson

trade5=pretty good trade

trade6= good trade.

I'm not sure which one will most likely happen.
Desmond
2008-07-19 12:03:15 UTC
trade 3 sucks.
KingJames
2008-07-19 12:30:02 UTC
none of those trades will never happen
Rahat
2008-07-20 09:23:21 UTC
i dont like the 2nd one and 3rd
2008-07-19 12:08:46 UTC
they all suck!honestly..!
2008-07-19 11:50:26 UTC
They're all horrible.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...